Navigation:


DISCUSSIONS > IIA GENERAL DISCUSSION AREA [ REFRESH ]
Thread Title: Electronic workpapers
Created On Friday January 20, 2006 5:17 PM
  Electronic workpapers
  Electronic workpapers
  Electronic workpapers
  Electronic workpapers
  Electronic workpapers
  Electronic workpapers
  Electronic workpapers
  Electronic workpapers
  Electronic workpapers


LLB18


Posts: 1
Joined: Jan 2006

Friday January 20, 2006 5:17 PM

User is offline View thread in raw text format

Anyone know where to find any analysis on electronic workpapers? My audit group consists of 3 people (staff, senior , manager) We are trying to determine which electronic working paper would best fit our need?

Thank you

-------------------------
You must stand for something or you will fall for anything!

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom



karkrazy


Posts: 14
Joined: Oct 2003

Monday January 23, 2006 8:47 AM

User is offline View thread in raw text format

Hi,


You have many options available in the market today. PwC Teammate is one such solution. We are using the same and am very satisfied with the outputs.

Regards
karkrazy2004

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom



Buster


Posts: 4
Joined: Apr 2005

Tuesday January 24, 2006 12:54 PM

User is offline View thread in raw text format

We started using Auto Audit (Word version) by Paisley Consulting about a year ago. It takes some time getting used to, but has also made it easier to keep electronic workpapers.

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom



Jerskins


Posts: 1
Joined: Jan 2007

Monday January 15, 2007 10:00 AM

User is offline View thread in raw text format

My company uses an electronic workpaper system that was developed internally. We generally attach more than one workpaper to each step. Does anyone know if every one of these workpapers needs to be signed off on or if we can just sign off on the audit step we are doing using the assumption that if we are signing off on the step we are signing off on all workpapers that are attached?

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom



planoisdaudit


Posts: 1814
Joined: Oct 2006

Tuesday January 16, 2007 9:40 AM

User is offline View users profile View thread in raw text format

Jerskins,

Standard 2340 states that engagements should be properly supervised. This has generally been interpreted to include sign off on individual workpapers as evidence of supervision.

-------------------------
Dan
Integrity can be defined as your moral soundness. A test for integrity - Do your actions match your words?

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom



planoisdaudit


Posts: 1814
Joined: Oct 2006

Tuesday January 16, 2007 9:43 AM

User is offline View users profile View thread in raw text format

LLB,

With such a small department, why the expensive overhead of an automated workpaper package. Generally, such packages are useful to larger shops with IA staff spread out globally. I have supervised many small shops and have seen no ROI to fielding an electronic workpaper system.

-------------------------
Dan
Integrity can be defined as your moral soundness. A test for integrity - Do your actions match your words?

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom



MP49E


Posts: 139
Joined: Mar 2006

Monday January 22, 2007 1:24 PM

User is offline View thread in raw text format



<< we can just sign off on the audit step we are doing using the assumption that if we are signing off on the step we are signing off on all workpapers that are attached? >>



You *can* do this, if such a practice is acceptable to your management, however there is obviously some risk in that the work won't be completed or reviewed as thoroughly. Our company's internal audit manual permitted an "Index Page" that listed all w/p's to be signed by the auditor and approved by the manager. The signatures on the "Index Page" were in lieu of signing every attached page.

That said - we are now using TeamMate, and the "Index Page" provision no longer exists (and will not be replicated in TeamMate)! Every audit step and attachment needs to be signed-off and approved. Makes one careful not to load too much extraneous info into TeamMate folders.

Edited: Monday January 22, 2007 at 1:24 PM by MP49E

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom



Garth


Posts: 38
Joined: Nov 2006

Monday January 22, 2007 4:09 PM

User is offline View thread in raw text format

Many auditing firms in Canada use a product called Caseware. It is setup to to signoff the pages if needed, it has a note section so from anywhere you can create queries and so on. In addition you can signout sections and then sign them back in. It is not very expessive - I think around $500 per user and annual maintenance fee.

www.caseware.ca

I've used it for a number of years and one of my collegues is also using it for internal auditing.


Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom



JarHead


Posts: 7
Joined: Jan 2007

Tuesday January 23, 2007 10:18 AM

User is offline View thread in raw text format

Do you have standards for your workpaper indexing? I started another thread on this topic........Thanks

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom

DISCUSSIONS > IIA GENERAL DISCUSSION AREA [ REFRESH ]
The Institute of Internal Auditors • 247 Maitland Avenue Altamonte Springs, FL. 32701-4201 USA
+1-407-937-1100 • FAX +1-407-937-1101 • www.theiia.org