Environment for Corruption
Edited by Michael Marinaccio
An audit department at a publicly traded U.S. firm with subsidiaries in Latin America investigates possible internal violations of the U.S. Foreign Practices Act.
ABC Tool Company, a publicly traded U.S. organization with global operations, is wrapping up construction on a large manufacturing facility in Latin America. All is going well, except that government authorities have decided to impose a potentially crippling sales tax on specific ABC products manufactured in Latin America for exportation. ABC is the only such manufacturer of these products.
ABC’s internal audit department has been asked to investigate possible U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations based on whistleblower hotline claims that an ABC manager may have been complicit in activity involving questionable payments to Latin American government officials. During their investigation, the audit team has uncovered evidence that ABC’s manufacturing plant manager has a good friend in the Ministry of Finance. Further review indicates that these two individuals traveled with their families from Latin America to the United States at ABC’s expense. The trip included a visit to ABC’s corporate headquarters, as well as sightseeing trips to New York City and Disney World.
Jim, the vice president of internal auditing, has just reviewed the audit file and debriefed his team. He’s concerned that ABC provided these travel benefits and payments to foreign government officials in return for receiving a tax exemption.
Can ABC legally pay for these activities, or do they in fact constitute an FCPA violation? What actions should Jim take in response to this situation?
How would you handle this scenario? Share your comments below.
Environment for Corruption
Q: Can ABC legally pay for these activities, or do they in fact constitute an FCPA violation?
A: Yes, if these payments are approved by the appropriate authority in the company as per approved limits of authority. The burden of proof whether it constitutes an FCPA violation is on the Federal Agencies. Semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit!
Q. What actions should Jim take in response to this situation?
A. To confirm all these transactions are authorized by the appropriate authorities within the company with complete information being disclosed to them.
Posted By: Henry Lee CL
2012-04-25 11:10 PM
- FCPA overrules company policy. FCPA is a Federal Act.
- Value is not a savior from prosecution. If your intent is to influence a government or it’s agent for preferential treatment or receive business than the company is in violation, the size or value of the gift/payment could be $20 or 20,000 or more.
- The individual does not need to be an employee of the company either; an agent of the company can put the company in jeopardy just the same.
Posted By: O. Chavez
2011-10-18 11:55 AM
Environment for Corruption
From its plain reading it seems to me that the manager of ABC Company had violated FPCA rules as his intentions were very clear and loud, not to pay the Sales tax leived by the latin american government. Such travel payments to the govt officials do not represent entertainment or gift expenses as these payments were quite substantial and most important is to consider the nature of the payment and the circumstances surrounded by it. It comes under the ambit of Fraud and Corruption which results in a bad image/ reputation of the company.
Posted By: Ardeshir Wania
2011-10-05 12:46 AM
on what ground entertainment is illegitimate
First check the co. policy on entertainment. what items are eligible. who are eligible. how much is claimable. what's the maximum limit allowable.
Second to look at who authorise the entertainment.
Third, if authorised, on what basis is available to argue that the entertainment is not legitimate.
4th is the basis in fcpa warrant giving entertainment is illegitimate.
5th on what happens if there is conflict btwn host legislation & fcpa, who will prevail if the incident happens not in usa.
Posted By: B Ooi
2011-03-29 10:03 AM
To me, one need to be abreast with what FCPA and ABC policies with regards to traveling and gift before any comment can be made. However, on the surface, it seems ABC has violated the procedures or policy by sponsoring what contracdits the policy or on the other hand trying to avoid mayment of mandatory tax of the state.
Posted By: GIBRIEL AWAL
2011-02-24 7:00 AM
I just went to a seminar on this, and other companies have been fined and sued by the US gov't for FCPA violations after taking foreign government officials on trips to places such as Disney World. So yes, these can be considered bribes under FCPA and this type of activity should be avoided, even if the intent is innocent.
Posted By: John Poole
2011-02-08 9:58 AM
On the surface it appears that ABC could pay for these activities. If the imposition of the tax was repealed, it would be a red flag that possibly illegal payments were made to Latin American government officials. I would determine how the company historically addressed bribes and illegal payments and review the company’s formal policy on gifts, bribes and illegal payments. I would also discuss this issue with ABC’s legal council to obtain a legal opinion on the travel gift, discuss international law ramifications, and determine the best approach to take and evidence to obtain, especially if top management approved the questionable payments.
Posted By: M. Amaral
2011-02-03 8:13 AM
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
Internal Auditor is pleased to provide you an opportunity to share your thoughts about the articles posted on this site. Some comments may be reprinted elsewhere, online, or offline. We encourage lively, open discussion and only ask that you refrain from personal comments and remarks that are off topic. Internal Auditor reserves the right to edit/remove comments.
To make something bold:
<strong>Text to bold</strong>
To make something italic:
<em>Text to italicize</em>
To make a hyperlink:
<a href="URL">Text to link</a>