REVEALING GHOST EMPLOYEES

The Star-Advertiser reports that a federal grand jury has indicted a Kaneohe, Hawaii, woman for allegedly attempting to embezzle more than US $200,000 from the security guard contracting firm for which she worked. The woman was in charge of entering time sheet and payroll data into the company’s computer system and allegedly placed two associates on the payroll even though they were not employed by the company, kept two terminated employees on the payroll, and directed checks from the “salaries” into her bank account as well as that of a relative and friend.

Lessons Learned

This alleged fraud demonstrates that ghost employees are still a fraud risk even when payroll is performed through electronic payment and automatic bank deposits. Adding ghost employees to a company’s payroll as well as not removing terminated employees from the payroll are simple ways for employees to embezzle from their companies.

Ghost employee fraud schemes often exploit major control weakness, such as poor segregation of duties. For example, an employee responsible for entering time sheet and payroll data may be able to create fictitious employees and alter bank deposit information. In situations where there is insufficient staff to provide for appropriate segregation of duties to serve as a preventive control, detective controls should be established. The payroll manager, for example, could review all new employee transactions, and someone else could monitor all changes to bank account information. Performing two simple tests can help an auditor expose ghost employee fraud schemes: running a report that identifies all cases where employees have the same bank account, as well as a report that shows payments made to employees after their termination date.

It is important for employers to check their other operations to verify that another payroll clerk is not taking advantage of the same control weaknesses, as it is likely that similar fraudulent schemes are occurring across the organization.


Share This Article:    


Ghost employee investigations
its clear here that non-segregation of the duty to prepare apayrol and data sheet entries resulted into this posibility however institutions must always identy controls that should be segregated in order for them to be assigned to different individuals in an entity.auditors should look for this and unearth potential fraud indicators.its good to have head counts done every three month to ensure that all the additions are genuine and deletions are done for those who left the organisation. we appreciate as readers and internal audit professionals such articles as this that open up vigilance in the profession
Posted By: OKURAPA SAMUEL CIA,ACCA,CPA,IIA
2014-02-10 8:31 AM


COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

Internal Auditor is pleased to provide you an opportunity to share your thoughts about the articles posted on this site. Some comments may be reprinted elsewhere, online, or offline. We encourage lively, open discussion and only ask that you refrain from personal comments and remarks that are off topic. Internal Auditor reserves the right to edit/remove comments.

Name:

Email:

Subject:

Comment:


To make something bold:
<strong>Text to bold</strong>

To make something italic:
<em>Text to italicize</em>

To make a hyperlink:
<a href="URL">Text to link</a>

 

Subscribe_June 2014 

IIA_AllStar_July2014

 IIA SmartBrief

Bookstore Digital

 IIA Academic_Nov 2013

 

 

 Twitter

 facebook IAO 

IA APP